Ensure research ethics compliance with our free research ethics checklist. No registration, no fees - just comprehensive guidance for ethical, IRB-compliant research.
Why Research Ethics Matter
Research ethics protect participants from harm while advancing knowledge responsibly. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) require comprehensive ethical review before approving human subjects research. Incomplete or inadequate ethics protocols lead to IRB delays, requests for revisions, or rejection. Systematic ethics review ensures participant safety and expedites IRB approval.
Ethical Principles
Research ethics rest on three foundational principles from the Belmont Report:
- Respect for persons - Autonomy and informed consent
- Beneficence - Maximize benefits, minimize harms
- Justice - Fair distribution of research risks and benefits
Informed Consent Checklist
Essential Consent Elements
✓ Study purpose clearly explained - Participants understand research goals ✓ Procedures described in plain language - What participants will do ✓ Time commitment specified - How long participation takes ✓ Voluntary participation emphasized - No coercion or pressure ✓ Right to withdraw stated - Can quit anytime without penalty ✓ Alternatives described - Other options available to participants ✓ Contact information provided - Who to call with questions
Risk and Benefit Disclosure
✓ All risks disclosed - Physical, psychological, social, economic risks ✓ Risk minimization explained - How risks are reduced ✓ Direct benefits described - Personal advantages (if any) ✓ Societal benefits stated - How research advances knowledge ✓ No benefit statement included - If no direct benefits exist ✓ Compensation described - Payment amounts and schedule
Consent Documentation
✓ Written consent form - For standard risk research ✓ Appropriate reading level - 8th grade or below ✓ IRB approval statement - Required language included ✓ Copy provided to participant - They receive signed copy ✓ Assent for minors - Child-appropriate assent forms ✓ Parental permission - For participants under 18
Confidentiality and Privacy
Data Protection Measures
✓ De-identification procedures - Removing identifying information ✓ Secure data storage - Password-protected, encrypted files ✓ Access limitations - Only research team views identified data ✓ Data retention plan - How long data will be stored ✓ Destruction timeline - When data will be deleted ✓ Breach response plan - Procedures if confidentiality compromised
Reporting and Publication
✓ Aggregate reporting - Individual identities protected in publications ✓ Pseudonym use - False names in qualitative reports ✓ Identifying detail removal - Geographic or demographic details modified ✓ Participant review option - Opportunity to review their quotes ✓ Consent for identifiable data - If photos, videos, or names will be used
Limits to Confidentiality
✓ Legal reporting requirements disclosed - Child abuse, imminent harm ✓ Subpoena possibility mentioned - Courts can compel disclosure ✓ Certificate of Confidentiality - Obtained for sensitive research (if applicable) ✓ Mandated reporting explained - Professional obligations to report
Risk Assessment
Physical Risks
✓ Medical procedures assessed - Blood draws, physical exams ✓ Environmental hazards evaluated - Field research dangers ✓ Fatigue and strain considered - Long sessions, demanding tasks ✓ Emergency procedures planned - Medical emergency response ✓ Participant screening - Health exclusions identified
Psychological Risks
✓ Emotional distress anticipated - Sensitive topics, triggering content ✓ Anxiety or stress evaluated - Performance tasks, social situations ✓ Trauma reactivation considered - For vulnerable populations ✓ Referral resources available - Mental health support contacts ✓ Debriefing procedures - Post-participation support
Social Risks
✓ Stigma potential assessed - Topics carrying social judgment ✓ Relationship impacts evaluated - Couples, families, communities ✓ Employment risks considered - Workplace studies ✓ Legal jeopardy assessed - Illegal activities, immigration status ✓ Reputation protection - Professional or community standing
Risk Minimization
✓ Alternative methods considered - Less risky approaches evaluated ✓ Safety protocols established - Procedures reducing risks ✓ Monitoring procedures - Ongoing assessment during research ✓ Stopping rules - When to halt participation for safety ✓ Proportionality justified - Risks reasonable given knowledge gained
Vulnerable Populations
Children and Minors
✓ Developmentally appropriate procedures - Age-suitable methods ✓ Parental/guardian permission - Legally required consent ✓ Child assent obtained - Age-appropriate agreement ✓ Minimal risk standard - Special protection for children ✓ Educational benefit - Research must benefit children as class
Pregnant Women
✓ Fetal risk assessed - Potential harm to pregnancy ✓ Partner notification - Father's involvement in consent ✓ Risk minimization - Precautions for pregnant participants ✓ Separate consent - For research affecting fetus ✓ Justification provided - Why pregnant women must be included
Prisoners
✓ Coercion eliminated - No pressure from incarceration ✓ Benefits not coercive - Compensation not excessive ✓ Generalizability justified - Why prisoners specifically needed ✓ Prisoner representative - On IRB reviewing protocol ✓ Follow-up provisions - Access to beneficial findings after release
Cognitively Impaired
✓ Capacity assessment - Determination of decision-making ability ✓ Legally authorized representative - Guardian consent obtained ✓ Assent when possible - Participant agreement even if not legally sufficient ✓ Benefit to class - Research must potentially help cognitively impaired ✓ Risk minimization - Extra protections for vulnerable population
IRB Requirements
Application Completeness
✓ Protocol narrative complete - All sections thoroughly addressed ✓ Consent forms finalized - Proper language and elements ✓ Recruitment materials included - Flyers, scripts, advertisements ✓ Instruments attached - Surveys, interview guides, measures ✓ Investigator qualifications - Training certificates, CVs ✓ Conflict of interest disclosed - Financial relationships declared
Review Level Determination
✓ Exempt status justified - Minimal risk, standard educational methods ✓ Expedited review appropriate - Minor risk, established procedures ✓ Full board review needed - Greater than minimal risk ✓ Continuing review planned - Annual renewal for ongoing studies ✓ Modifications anticipated - Protocol change procedures understood
Regulatory Compliance
✓ CITI training current - Human subjects protection certification ✓ HIPAA compliance - For protected health information ✓ FERPA compliance - For educational records ✓ Data security standards - Institutional requirements met ✓ Funding agency requirements - NIH, NSF, foundation policies
Cultural Sensitivity
Community Engagement
✓ Stakeholder consultation - Community input on research design ✓ Cultural appropriateness - Methods respectful of cultural norms ✓ Language accessibility - Materials in participants' languages ✓ Community benefit - Results shared with participating communities ✓ Power dynamics acknowledged - Researcher privilege recognized
Inclusive Practices
✓ Diverse representation - Sampling includes underrepresented groups ✓ Accessibility accommodations - Physical, sensory, cognitive access ✓ Scheduling flexibility - Accommodates participant constraints ✓ Location accessibility - Transportation and parking considered ✓ Compensation appropriateness - Fair payment without coercion
Transform Your Research Ethics
Stop submitting incomplete IRB applications. Use our comprehensive ethics checklist ensuring participant protection, regulatory compliance, and expedited IRB approval.
Visit https://www.subthesis.com/tools/research-ethics-checklist - Start your ethics review today, no registration required!